Gitflow
Gitflow is a branching model designed for structured releases and long-term maintenance.
Main Branches
-
main(ormaster) Always contains production-ready code -
developIntegration branch for completed features before a release.
Supporting branches
-
feature/*Created fromdevelopfor new features. -
release/*Created fromdevelopto prepare a release (bug fixes, version bumps, Documentation). -
hotfix/*Created frommainto quickly fix production bugs.
Typical flow
- Create
feature/*fromdevelop - Merge feature into
develop - Create
release/*fromdevelop - Merge release into
mainanddevelop - Tag the release
- Use
hotfix/*if production issues occur
Pros (Advantage)
- Clear separation of development, release, and production
- Good for large teams and scheduled releases
- Works well with versioned software
Cons (Disadvantage)
- Complex
- Heavy branching and merging
- Slower for continuous deployment
Best for
- Enterprise systems
- Products with fixed release cycles
- Teams needing strict control
GitHub Flow
GitHub Flow is a lightweight workflow optimized for continuous deployment.
Main branch
-
mainAlways deployable
Branches
- Feature branches
Created directly from
mainand merged back via Pull Requests.
Typical flow
- Create a branch from
main - Make changes and commit
- Open a Pull Request
- Review, test, CI runs
- Merge into
main - Deploy immediately
Pros
- Simple and fast
- Easy to understand
- Excellent for CI/CD
- Fewer merge conflicts
Cons
- Not ideal for long release preparation
- Requires strong testing and CI discipline
Best for
- Web applications
- SaaS products
- Small to medium teams
- Continuous deployment environments.
Key Differences
| Aspect | Gitflow | GitHub Flow |
|---|---|---|
| Complexity | High | Low |
| Branches | Many | Few |
| Releases | Scheduled | Continuous |
| CI/CD | Optional | Essential |
| Best use | Large, structured projects | Modern web & SaaS apps |
Top comments (0)